he case on page 100 of the text, State v. Burrell, and State v. Stark on page 135. Apply principles from the reading to the following: WESTON, Wis. — Kara Neumann, 11, had grown so weak that she could not walk or speak. Her parents, who believe that God alone has the ability to heal the sick, prayed for her recovery but did not take her to a doctor. After an aunt from California called the sheriff’s department here, frantically pleading that the sick child be rescued, an ambulance arrived at the Neumann’s rural home on the outskirts of Wausau and rushed Kara to the hospital. She was pronounced dead on arrival. The county coroner ruled that she had died from diabetic ketoacidosisLinks to an external site. resulting from undiagnosed and untreated juvenile diabetesLinks to an external site.. The condition occurs when the body fails to produce insulin, which leads to severe dehydrationLinks to an external site. and impairment of muscle, lung and heart function. “Basically everything stops,” said Dr. Louis Philipson, who directs the diabetes center at the University of Chicago Medical Center, explaining what occurs in patients who do not know or “are in denial that they have diabetes.” About a month after Kara’s death last March, the Marathon County state attorney, Jill Falstad, brought charges of reckless endangerment against her parents, Dale and Leilani Neumann. Despite the Neumanns’ claim that the charges violated their constitutional right to religious freedom, Judge Vincent Howard of Marathon County Circuit Court ordered Ms. Neumann to stand trial on May 14, and Mr. Neumann on June 23. If convicted, each faces up to 25 years in prison. Wisconsin Reckless Homicide: The defendant creates an unreasonable and substantial risk of death to another human being; The defendant was subjectively aware of the risk; and The defendant caused the death of another Questions: What facts do you need to know to determine whether the Neumann’s committed reckless homicide? What ACT did the parents commit? Does it matter that the parents did not know the child’s diagnosis? If not, what factors would satisfy the elements? If the parents are guilty, what is the appropriate outcome? What factors are relevant for sentencing?