00:01
So here we've got three different multiple choice questions.
00:03
I'll try to walk through each of them in turn, though this might be a little bit lengthy.
00:07
So why are tradeoffs necessary? a, diminishing returns or diminishing marginal returns.
00:13
This is wrong.
00:15
Diminishing marginal returns says that as you get more and more and something, it becomes less and less valuable to you.
00:22
If you have a little food, the food is very valuable.
00:26
As you get more and more and more food, each unit of food is less and less valuable.
00:30
You still want as much as possible.
00:32
So this is this is not about trade ops, right? b, again, this is the same thing instead of diminishing returns, diminishing utility, which is, you know, basically identical.
00:45
Returns is how much you produce of something, like if you get more and more farmland, how much many crops you can get out of it.
00:52
The utility is how you feel about the crops.
00:54
This is also just, these are just described properties and functions.
00:59
They don't say anything about tradeoffs.
01:01
See, this is obviously it.
01:04
Limited resources, right? we don't have an infinite amount of resources.
01:10
We only have a limited amount of resources because there is a limit on resources that we cannot satisfy everything we might want because we cannot satisfy everything we might want.
01:20
There's tradeoffs, d, opportunity costs.
01:24
This is again sort of meaningless.
01:26
There are opportunity costs because there are limited resources, right? c implies d.
01:35
And the fact that opportunity costs are different doesn't say anything in particular.
01:40
E, so this one's also wrong.
01:43
And e excess supply.
01:46
This is just garbage.
01:48
They're running out of reasonable answers here.
01:51
Excess supply, well, for starters, doesn't exist when markets clear.
01:55
And in many markets there are not, there is not excess supply.
01:59
Excess of the existence of excess supply does not make tradeoffs necessary, right? non -rival good for two...