5. Using money creation to pay for government spending Consider Arcadia, a hypothetical country that produces only salmon burgers. In 2021, a salmon burger is priced at $4.00. Complete the first row of the table with the quantity of salmon burgers that can be bought with $1,100. Hint: In this problem, assume it is not possible to buy a fraction of a salmon burger, and always round down to the nearest whole salmon burger. For example, if your calculations result in 1.5 salmon burgers, the answer should be 1 salmon burger. Year | Price of a Salmon burger (Dollars) | Salmon burgers Bought with $1,100 (Quantity) --- | --- | --- 2021 | 4.00 | 2022 | | Suppose the government of Arcadia cannot raise sufficient tax revenue to pay its debts. In order to meet its debt obligations, the government prints money. As a result, the money supply rises by 50% by 2022. Assuming monetary neutrality holds, complete the second row of the table with the new price of a salmon burger and the new quantity of salmon burgers that can be bought with $1,100 in 2022. The impact of the government's decision to raise revenue by printing money on the value of money is known as the
Added by Alberto V.
Close
Step 1
The correct term is C) inflation tax. This term refers to the decrease in the value of money held by the public caused by inflation, which can result from an increase in the money supply, such as when the government prints money. Show more…
Show all steps
Your feedback will help us improve your experience
Andrew Davis and 80 other Macroeconomics educators are ready to help you.
Ask a new question
Labs
Want to see this concept in action?
Explore this concept interactively to see how it behaves as you change inputs.
Key Concepts
Recommended Videos
Assume the Central Bank of your country increases the money supply by 18%. Using appropriate diagrams, explain and show why a classical economist would view such a policy as unimportant. In which situation would the classical economists view money as important? Explain.
Jennifer S.
The consumption and saving functions in the Keynesian model Suppose we observe that a person's disposable income (DI) is 50,000 in 2019 and 63,000 in 2020. Suppose we observe that this person's consumption (C) is 47,000 in 2019 and 58,700 in 2020. Assume that this person's consumption obeys the Keynesian consumption function, So that C = A + MPC * DI. Finally, assume that A and MPC are unchanged between 2019 and 2020. (a) Calculate the values of A and MPC for this consumer; and graph the consumption function: (Hint: subtract the C function in 2019 from the C function of 2020). (b) In general, saving is given by the formula S = DI - C. Calculate this person's saving in 2019 and 2020. Assuming that this person's wealth (net worth) on January 1, 2019 was 80,000, what is their wealth on January 1, 2020 and on January 1, 2021? (c) In general, if consumption is given by the function C = A + MPC * DI; then saving will obey the saving function S = -A + (1 - MPC) * DI. Plot the saving function graphically for the consumer in this problem (using the values you found in part (a)): What is this consumer's marginal propensity to save? (d) Calculate the level of disposable income such that saving is exactly zero for this person. If disposable income is less than this level, what happens to saving? Explain how a person can have 'negative saving'; and give two examples of how a person can finance negative saving. (e) Suppose that this person earns 70,000 in 2021. What will their saving be in 2021? (f) Which of the following combinations of asset transactions could be consistent with the level of saving that you found for this person in 2021? More than one answer can be correct; answer either 'yes' or "no" for each of the following combinations and explain your answer in terms of the increase in net worth implied by these transactions. F1: Buy 1000 worth of stocks, sell 4000 worth of jewelry F2: Buy house worth 200,000; take out a 195,000 mortgage loan F3: Repay 10,000 student loan; put 5000 in bank account F4: Repay a 7,000 personal loan, sell 2000 worth of stocks
Manasvee S.
Capital taxation in the Ramsey-Cass-Koopmans model. Consider Ramsey-Cass-Koopmans economy that is on its balanced growth path. Suppose that at some time, which we will call time 0 , the government switches to a policy of taxing investment income at rate $\tau .$ Thus the real interest rate that households face is now given by $r(t)=(1-\tau) f^{\prime}(k(t)) .$ Assume that the government returns the revenue it collects from this tax through lump-sum transfers. Finally, assume that this change in tax policy is unanticipated. (a) How, if at all, does the tax affect the $c=0$ locus? The $k=0$ locus? (b) How does the economy respond to the adoption of the tax at time 0? What are the dynamics after time $0 ?$ (c) How do the values of $c$ and $k$ on the new balanced growth path compare with their values on the old balanced growth path? (d) (This is based on Barro, Mankiw, and Sala-i-Martin, $1995 .$ ) Suppose there are many economies like this one. Workers' preferences are the same in each country, but the tax rates on investment income may vary across countries. Assume that each country is on its balanced growth path. (i) Show that the saving rate on the balanced growth path, $\left(y^{*}-c^{*}\right) / y^{*},$ is decreasing in $\tau$ (ii) Do citizens in low- $\tau,$ high- $k^{*},$ high-saving countries have any incentive to invest in low-saving countries? Why or why not? (e) Does your answer to part (c) imply that a policy of subsidizing investment (that is, making $\tau<0$ ), and raising the revenue for this subsidy through lump-sum taxes, increases welfare? Why or why not? $(f)$ How, if at all, do the answers to parts $(a)$ and $(b)$ change if the government does not rebate the revenue from the tax but instead uses it to make government purchases?
Recommended Textbooks
Principles of Economics
Macroeconomics
Economics
Transcript
18,000,000+
Students on Numerade
Trusted by students at 8,000+ universities
Watch the video solution with this free unlock.
EMAIL
PASSWORD