00:01
In this question, we have an expression restricted by some conditions.
00:04
So we need to basically prove that g of n is equal to g of n minus 1 plus g of n minus 2, where n is greater than equals to 3.
00:15
Right.
00:15
So now we can say that let j of n is equal to, it will be 1 comma 2 and this go on up to n, right? and then here we can say the extraordinary subset of j of n can be divided into two parts and they will be basically a and the other one will be b and they are mutually exclusive and hence we can say that g of n will be equal to mod of a plus mod of b and hence we can say the extraordinary subsets of j of n.
00:48
We are talking about extraordinary subsets of j of n which do not contain n.
00:54
So here it does not contain n so it can be written for best.
00:59
Better understanding as well.
01:02
So it will be like this.
01:04
Precisely the extraordinary subsets of j of n minus 1 and hence we can say it will be j of n minus 1 and then here from this very information we can say g of n minus 1 will be equal to a mod of a.
01:21
Basically what we have done in the above statement we have said the extraordinary subsets of j of n which do not contain n are the extraordinary subsets of j of n minus 1.
01:33
And hence we have written this very expression.
01:36
So proceeding further, we can say extraordinary subsets of j of n which contains n.
01:43
So here we are talking about extraordinary subsets of j of n which contains n have a bijection with extraordinary subsets of j of n minus 2.
01:55
So now we can say that let x be the.
01:59
Subset of j of n minus 2.
02:03
Now x dash be the subset formed by increasing all the elements of x by 1.
02:11
So x dash is formed by increasing all the elements of x by 1 and hence we can say that call f of x and in that case it will be a set formed by adding n to x.
02:27
So f of x is formed by adding n to x.
02:29
X set...