00:05
So the question states that, are international institutions designed to only simply resolve corporation problems or to magnify the interest of the powerful states, provided strongest empirical evidence of each use? since scholar claimed that international law includes the state government, so describe the international law and how to evaluate the state government.
00:34
The question regarding the international institutions and their efficiently resolving the corporation problem is called complex and debatable.
00:47
Here are some of the arguments in evidence supporting both the views.
00:51
First is efficient resolution of corporation problems.
01:09
The empirical evidence states that, proponents of this view argue that international institution facilitates corporation among states and provides mechanism for resolving conflicts peacefully.
01:37
Institutions facilitates the corporation among states provides mechanism for resolving conflicts.
02:13
The existence of institutions such as the un, wto and imf, united nations, world trade organization and international monetary fund are some of the examples that showcase the efforts to address global issues correctly.
02:46
These institutions have played roles in promoting economic cooperation, conflict resolution and development programs.
03:15
The case study could be, for example, let's suppose the formation and the functioning of the european union, eu, can be considered as an evidence for the efficient resolution of corporation problems.
03:48
The eu was created with the aim of fostering peace, stability and economic integration among member states.
04:16
It has successfully facilitated trade, harmonised revolution and resolved disputes throughout supranational institutions like european commission and european court of justice.
04:28
So, this is one of the examples of institution for efficient resolution of corporation problems.
04:37
The next evidence is second, magnification of powerful states ' interest.
04:57
Empirical evidence shows that, for example, critics often argue that powerful states often dominate international institutions and shape their agendas to serve their own interests.
05:22
This can be seen in the decision making process and voting power distribution within the institutions such as the united nations security council where there is only a group of five members that controls the vote distribution and have more control over the significant topics of discussion.
05:43
The dominance of certain countries can limit the effectiveness and the fairness of the decision making processes.
05:52
Case study, the influence of the powerful state in shaping global economic policy can be seen through the institutions such as the world bank, the imf, the international monetary fund.
06:22
These two important organisations are actually governed by single country.
06:41
The voting power and decision making authority within these organisations are heavily strict towards major economies, leading to concern about the disproportionate representation and influence of the powerful states.
06:53
And by that i mean the pre -australian states.
06:57
So, we can say that the powers are quite disproportionate and skewed towards the developed nations...