A carrier transporting goods under a B/L is required to exercise "due diligence" in Making the rail land-worthy Making the ship safe and fit for their reception, carriage and preservation of goods Loading and handling of goods with care All of the above
Added by Vicenta R.
Close
Step 1
Texts: A carrier transporting goods under a B/L is required to exercise "due diligence" in Making the rail land-worthy Making the ship safe and fit for their reception, carriage and preservation of goods Loading and handling of goods with care All of the above Show more…
Show all steps
Your feedback will help us improve your experience
Adi S and 71 other Biology educators are ready to help you.
Ask a new question
Labs
Want to see this concept in action?
Explore this concept interactively to see how it behaves as you change inputs.
Key Concepts
Recommended Videos
A merchant in Tema sent 100 boxes made of Ghana native sandals in a container to the shipping line GRACE for shipment to Johannesburg. Before the shipment was made, there had been an email exchange determining the type of goods, freight payable, type of shipment, port of loading, destination, consignee, and other details covering the time of delivery to the carrier. (b) Discuss the carrier's claim of "not being liable for the damage" caused. (c) Discuss the function of the bill of lading as a receipt using facts in the scenario to support your answer.
Adi S.
A marine insurance policy on a cargo states that "the insurer shall be liable for losses incident to the perils of the sea." During the voyage, seawater entered the compartment where the cargo was stored due to the defective drainpipe of the ship. The insured filed an action on the policy for recovery of the damages caused to the cargo. May the insured recover the damages? a. No, the insured may not recover damages. b. Yes, the insured may recover damages. c. Yes, the insured may recover damages as stated in Section 86 of the Insurance Code.
Crystal W.
In the case James Drummond v E.H. Van Ingen (case where the dye in the cloth ran when wet), the court held that the purchaser: A. had an obligation to inspect the cloth at the time of purchase and did not do so. B. could not succeed in its action against the defendant for a defect in the cloth it should have found upon inspection. C. could not seek a remedy against the seller of the cloth as there was no privity of contract between the tailor and the manufacturer. D. had performed its obligation of inspection with due care and diligence, in an ordinary way, with the knowledge possessed by merchants of that class at that time.
Jennifer S.
Recommended Textbooks
Biology for AP Courses
Objective Biology for NEET
Introduction to General, Organic and Biochemistry
Transcript
18,000,000+
Students on Numerade
Trusted by students at 8,000+ universities
Watch the video solution with this free unlock.
EMAIL
PASSWORD