00:02
In the challenging situation, there are compelling arguments for each of the three patients to receive the kidney transplant.
00:10
Will it analyze the case from the perspective of egoism or utilitarian taking into account the interest of the diverse population? first is the egoist perspective.
00:29
So, john's situation is critical and without the transplant he is predicted to die within a week.
00:42
He is relatively young and has the financial means to search for a kidney outside the legal channel.
00:48
From an egoistic standpoint, one could argue that john should receive the kidney since it would preserve his life and he has the resources to pursue alternative venues for finding a donor.
01:01
From this perspective, we can argue that john should receive the kidney since it would preserve his life and he has the resources to pursue alternative venues for finding a doctor.
02:03
Then is the utilitarian perspective.
02:17
So, jane is a 55 -year -old mother of two young adults.
02:21
Her survival would allow her to continue supporting her children emotionally and possibly financially also.
02:28
So, the utilitarian argument could be made that saving jane's life would have a broader positive impact on her family.
02:44
Than saving one individual as it preserves the well -being of multiple individuals...