Consider the overall tone of the article. Would you describe it as objective? Why or why not? Select the valid arguments for each case below.Choose one or more:A.It may or may not be objective depending on what aspect of the article you are focusing on. It is objective when it speaks of the JWSTs capabilities, but it is not objective when it speaks about the JWST as if it is an undeniably worthwhile project without discussing whether that money would be better spent on other things.B.Yes, it is objective; it is objective because the better sensitivity, spectral resolution, and wavelength coverage are based on well-established science and engineering so the author is not spinning any results to make the telescope look better than it is.C.Yes, it is objective; it is objective because generating new knowledge is always worth any expense incurred.D.No, it is not objective; it is not objective because NASA really has no idea whether the JWST will really have better sensitivity, spectral resolution, and wavelength coverage.E.No, it is not objective; it is not objective because the articles author is clearly biased about what the JWST can do without any care about how much it cost and without mentioning whether its findings are worth the cost.