Define a relation R from the set of real numbers to itself as follows: Let x and y be real numbers. Then (x, y) ∈ R if x = y or x - y is an irrational number. Prove or disprove that R is an equivalence relation.
Added by Carla R.
Step 1
Reflexive: For a relation to be reflexive, (x, x) must be in R for all x in the set of real numbers. Since x - x = 0, which is not irrational, we have x = x, so (x, x) is in R. Therefore, R is reflexive. Show more…
Show all steps
Close
Your feedback will help us improve your experience
Madhur L and 75 other Calculus 3 educators are ready to help you.
Ask a new question
Labs
Want to see this concept in action?
Explore this concept interactively to see how it behaves as you change inputs.
Key Concepts
Recommended Videos
Let R be the relation on the set of real numbers such that xRy if and only if x and y are real numbers that differ by less than 1, that is |x - y| < 1. Show that R is not an equivalence relation.
Oswaldo J.
Consider the following relations: $R=\{(x, y) \mid x, y$ are real numbers and $x=w y$ for some rational number $w\} ;$ $S=\left\{\begin{array}{l}\left(\frac{m}{p}, \frac{p}{q}\right) m, n, p \text { and } q \in \mathbf{Z} \\ \text { such that } n, q \neq 0 \text { and } q m=p n\end{array}\right\}$ Then [2010] (A) neither $R$ nor $S$ is an equivalence relation (B) $S$ is an equivalence relation but $R$ is not an equivalence relation (C) $R$ and $S$ both are equivalence relations (D) $R$ is an equivalence relation but $S$ is not an equivalence relation
Recommended Textbooks
Calculus: Early Transcendentals
Thomas Calculus
Transcript
Watch the video solution with this free unlock.
EMAIL
PASSWORD