Hobart defends Compatibilism, the view that it is possible for a person to act of her own free will at the same time that determinism is true. He also defends a kind of incompatibility thesis which has no standard name. Which of the following best expresses that incompatibility thesis?
It is not possible for a person to act of her own free will if the action is not causally determined by her own character or psychology.
It is not possible for a person to act of her own free will if she does not understand how her own behavior is determined.
It is not possible for a person to act of her own free will if every event (including people's decisions) is causally determined by preceding events and the laws of nature.
It is not possible for a person to act of her own free will if the action is one that she was destined to perform.
