00:06
The question is regarding, consider justice john marshall's ruling in the cherokee nation vs georgia in 1831 and worchester vs georgia in 1832 cases.
00:20
What might account for the differentiation in the rulings? well, the differentiation in the justice john marshall ruling in cherokee nation vs georgia and worchester vs georgia may be attributed to the evolving legal arguments, political considerations, and the recognition of native american in worchester.
01:28
The racial attitude and beliefs likely influenced the cases as the ruling reflected the prevailing prejudice and biases of the time.
02:39
The next question is, evaluate the difference in marshall's court approach to these cases and examine the influence of racial attitudes and beliefs and the race of plaintiff on the case.
02:57
Which level of government determines how districts are drawn? district lines are determined by the state government.
03:39
District lines are redrawn every 10 years following the release of decennial census data to account for changes in the population distribution.
04:59
Now, next question is, what are new district lines based on? new district lines are based on population equality, adherence to the principle of one person, one vote, preservation of communities of interest, and the compliance with voting rights act are among other factors that are considered for new district lines.
06:24
Next question is, define gerrymandering and how does gerrymandering influence electoral outcomes? gerrymandering refers to the manipulation of the district boundaries to favor particular political party or group.
08:35
It can influence electoral outcomes by concentrating or dispersing voters of a specific party, potentially leading to uncompetitive races or dominance of one party in a given district or state.
09:31
Next question is, what was the result of us supreme court overturning of this congressional act? after the voting right of 1965, the congress attempted to prevent states from gerrymandering to decrease the influence of racial minorities in elections by introducing pre -clearance requirement, section 5th of the act.
10:14
However, the supreme court overturning of a key provision in shelby county v.
10:20
Holder in 2013 removed the pre -clearance requirement, allowing some states to implement redistricting plans that have been criticized for their potential to dilute minority voting power...