00:01
So here the question is in parts and at the first part we need to do comparison of comparison of locke and berkeley's on the relatively relativity of perception.
00:16
So first we are talking about the locke's view.
00:21
So when we talk about his view john locke believe in the relativity of perception.
00:27
He believed on relativity of perception asserting that our perceptions are representation of external world.
00:44
He thought that our perception are representation of external world.
00:52
He argued that primary properties like size, shape, motion are objective and exist in external world independent of our perception.
01:05
Secondary qualities he thought primary qualities are basically they are independent while secondary qualities on the other hand are subjective and depend on the observers experience.
01:27
Secondary quality are dependent like color, taste and smell are dependent on observers sensory experience.
01:39
While we talking about the berkeley's view berkeley's view.
01:52
So here basically george berkeley took a more radical approach and argue for idealism.
01:58
He focus on more radical approach and argue for the idealism which deny the existence of material physical world altogether.
02:15
He believe that all exist are ideas all exist are ideas and that external world is composed of ideas in mind.
02:27
Okay, so berkeley contended that everything we perceive is relative to our mind and the qualities of objective exist as ideas in our mind or the mind of god.
02:40
So basically we focus on the ideas on mind.
02:44
Now defense of views when we talk about the law defended his view by distinguishing primary and secondary qualities that argue primary qualities are inherent and provided by basis for knowledge berkeley defended his idealism by asserting that material substance are unnecessary.
03:04
Now we talk about this second part of the question here...