If we say that God commands conduct because it is good, that means we are treating "because God says so" as [pick the best answer]:
an explanatory moral reason.
an enumerative moral reason.
an exculpatory reason.
not a moral reason at all.
Question 2 (2 points)
If reading literally doesn't provide good moral guidance, then this implies that [pick the best answer]:
a) Scripture must be interpreted in order to derive moral guidance from it.
b) Moral questions have no answers.
c) We should ignore scripture and not take it seriously.
d) Morality has nothing to do with religion.
Question 3 (2 points)
When we read scripture literally, we make what assumption? (Pick the best answer.)
a) That scripture always provides explanatory moral reasons.
b) That human reason is infallible.
c) That if scripture explicitly says that something is right or wrong, then that is enough to show that it is actually right or wrong for us (no more thinking required).
d) That "because God says so" is an explanatory moral reason.
Question 4 (2 points)
Which of the following best characterizes SWARTWOOD's position on scripture in "Religion and Moral Reasons"?