read case 31 e h cruises ltd v baker pages 66 67 and answer the following questionsms baker rais

The court denied jurisdiction because it found that the case did not meet the requirements for d

So the court has original jurisdiction over the case, it's likely to be in a court in Baltimore.

Question

Ms. Baker raised which of the following factual issues in trying to establish jurisdiction (choose each that apply): - RCCL and E&H entered into a Tour Operator Agreement creating an agency or joint venture relationship. - Tickets for the excursion were available to purchase in Florida. - Personal jurisdiction can be found pursuant to the indemnification provision found in the Tour Operator Agreement. - E&H's principal resided in Florida. - E&H's principal traveled to Miami to conduct business. - E&H utilized a Florida broker to obtain its insurance policy. - E&H maintained an office in Florida. What was the reasoning of the Court for denying jurisdiction? Rather than curtailing your out of country travels, what steps could you take so that you are not in the same position as Ms. Baker?

          Ms. Baker raised which of the following factual issues in trying to establish jurisdiction (choose each that apply):

- RCCL and E&H entered into a Tour Operator Agreement creating an agency or joint venture relationship.
- Tickets for the excursion were available to purchase in Florida.
- Personal jurisdiction can be found pursuant to the indemnification provision found in the Tour Operator Agreement.
- E&H's principal resided in Florida.
- E&H's principal traveled to Miami to conduct business.
- E&H utilized a Florida broker to obtain its insurance policy.
- E&H maintained an office in Florida.

What was the reasoning of the Court for denying jurisdiction? Rather than curtailing your out of country travels, what steps could you take so that you are not in the same position as Ms. Baker?

Added by Juana N.

Question

Please give Ace some feedback