00:01
Hello, today we have the following payoff matrix and we have to answer a few questions, ultimately finding the nash equilibrium.
00:09
So firstly, does player one have a dominant strategy? so a dominant strategy is where, no matter what the other player chooses, one strategy has a better payoff for player one.
00:22
So in this instance, we'll look at player one strategies.
00:26
So if player one chooses strategy a, they will either make a hundred, 100, their payoff will be 100 or 125, depending on what player 2 chooses.
00:38
So if player 1 chooses strategy b, they will either make 50 or 75 depending on what player 2 chooses their strategy to be.
00:48
So let's just do a direct comparison of what would happen depending on what player two chooses.
00:55
So if player chooses strategy a, player one will either make 100 or 50.
01:00
So, in the first instance, 100 is greater than 50, meaning strategy a is better.
01:07
Now, if player two goes with strategy b, player one will either make 125 or 75.
01:16
So once again, 125 is greater than 75, meaning strategy a is better.
01:21
So player one does indeed have a dominant strategy, and that would be strategy a, because no matter what player two chooses, strategy a will always grant a greater payoff for player one.
01:36
So with that said, we know that since strategy a is dominant for player 1, player 1 is never going to choose strategy b.
01:48
So we can kind of cross this out, and we'll go into the next question.
01:53
So now we're looking for the solution of the game using the nash equilibrium.
01:57
So we already have player one's dominant strategy, which is a...