Which of the following statements is true about a RETAINED Ho in B, R? There is not enough evidence to conclude there is a linear association. You conclude there is an association. There is not enough evidence to conclude there is an association. There is no difference on whatever the dependent variable is for the values of the interval variable.
Added by Keith B.
Step 1
The statement refers to a null hypothesis (Ho) in the context of a statistical test, specifically regarding the relationship between two variables (B and R). The null hypothesis typically states that there is no effect or no association between the variables. Show more…
Show all steps
Close
Your feedback will help us improve your experience
Sri K and 96 other Intro Stats / AP Statistics educators are ready to help you.
Ask a new question
Labs
Want to see this concept in action?
Explore this concept interactively to see how it behaves as you change inputs.
Key Concepts
Recommended Videos
2.2. In a test of the alternatives H0: ̢1 ≤ 0 versus Ha: ̢1 > 0, an analyst concluded H0. Does this conclusion imply that there is no linear association between X and Y? Explain.
Sri K.
If you perform a hypothesis test on the population slope Parameter (β1) in regression analysis and do NOT reject the Null hypothesis: Ho: β1= 0. Your conclusion would be: Group of answer choices The least squares sample regression equation should not be used because there is not sufficient evidence of a relationship between the independent variable and the dependent variable.. The least squares sample regression equation should be used because there is sufficient evidence of a relationship between the independent variable and the dependent variable.. The least squares sample regression equation should not be used because there is sufficient evidence of a relationship between the independent variable and the dependent variable.. The least squares sample regression equation should be used because there is no evidence of a relationship between the independent variable and the dependent variable. none of these
Madhur L.
Continued from the previous question: Step 3: Ignore your answers in Steps 1 and 2. Suppose the P-value of the F test is 0.062. Which of the following conclusions is most justified regarding the relationship between the response and the explanatory variable? There is no evidence of a linear relationship between the two variables since the P-value is nearly zero. There is distinctive evidence at ̑ = 1% that the two variables are linearly related. There is distinctive evidence at ̑ = 5% but not at ̑ = 1% that the two variables are linearly related. There is no evidence of a linear relationship between the two variables at ̑ = 5% or ̑ = 1% since the P-value is greater than the significance level.
Adi S.
Recommended Textbooks
Elementary Statistics a Step by Step Approach
The Practice of Statistics for AP
Introductory Statistics
Transcript
Watch the video solution with this free unlock.
EMAIL
PASSWORD