• Home
  • Textbooks
  • Physical Biology of the Cell
  • Electrostatics for Salty Solutions

Physical Biology of the Cell

Rob Phillips, Jane Kondev, Julie Theriot

Chapter 9

Electrostatics for Salty Solutions - all with Video Answers

Educators


Chapter Questions

03:17

Problem 1

(a) In Equation $9.21,$ we asserted a relation between the divergence of the electric field and the charge density. Imitate the one-dimensional derivation culminating in Equation 9.20 to deduce Equation $9.21 .$ To do this, explicitly compute the flux through a small cubical volume element like that shown in Figure 9.9
(b) By using the fact that the electric field can be written as $\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r})=-\nabla V(\mathbf{r}),$ write a partial differential equation relating the potential and the charge density.

Sana Riaz
Sana Riaz
Numerade Educator
05:41

Problem 2

(a) The pH of the $E$ coli cytosol is about $7.6-7.8 .$ How many free protons per cell does this equate to?
(b) The pH of the periplasmic space is about $7.0 .$ Estimate the number of protons in the periplasmic space.
(Problem courtesy of Andrew Chisholm)

Danielle Ashley
Danielle Ashley
Numerade Educator
04:04

Problem 3

(a) Deduce the electric field of a uniformly charged sphere of radius $R$ and total charge $Q .$ Obtain the field both within and on the exterior of the sphere.
(b) Deduce the electric field of a uniformly charged spherical shell of radius $R$ and total charge $Q$
(c) In Section $9.3 .3,$ we considered the screening of the charge on a protein by charges in solution. In that toy model, we approximated the field in the screening cloud by assuming that all the screening charges are at a fixed distance from the protein surface, which led to the formula $$E=\frac{Q}{D \varepsilon_{0} A}$$ Use Gauss' law for two uniformly and oppositely charged parallel plates separated by distance $d$, with surface charge density $\pm Q / A$, to show that this is the field in between the plates.

Kajal Gautam
Kajal Gautam
Numerade Educator
01:14

Problem 4

Deduce the energy of a charged shell as given by Equation 9.38.

Zachary Warner
Zachary Warner
Numerade Educator
03:56

Problem 5

In the chapter, we considered the equilibrium constant for the assembly of a viral capsid, and its salt dependence. In experiments, this equilibrium constant is usually determined by measuring the relative amounts of free capsomers and completed capsids using size exclusion chromatography, for example. Furthermore, in the data analysis leading up to the equilibrium constant, one typically assumes that partially formed capsids are present in negligible amounts in solution, and can be ignored. Here we investigate this assumption in the context of a simple version of an equilibrium model for the assembly of icosahedral viral capsids described by Zlotnick (1994). Our model for a capsid is a dodecahedron that assembles from 12 identical pentagonal subunits. When subunits associate, they make favorable contacts along edges with an energy $\Delta \varepsilon<0$ per edge, and pay a translational entropy penalty due to the loss of translational degrees of freedom once the subunits are part of the larger assembly. We assume that assembly occurs through binding of subunits in such a way that the only allowed species are those consistent with all or part of the final dodecahedron product. We seek to evaluate the equilibrium amount of free capsomers, complete dodecahedrons, and partially assembled structures. The energy for a structure of size $n$ is given by $$\varepsilon_{n}=\sum_{m=1}^{n} f_{m} \Delta \varepsilon$$ where $f_{n}$ is the number of additional contacts created when a capsomer binds to a structure of size $n-1$ to form a structure of size $n$. To simplify matters further, we consider the following form for the number of contacts $$f_{n}=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}
1 & (n=2) \\
2 & (3 \leq n \leq 7) \\
3 & (8 \leq n \leq 10) \\
4 & (n=11) \\
5 & (n=12)
\end{array}\right.$$ Note that within this model, $f_{1}=0,$ meaning that individual capsomers set the zero of energy.
To describe the state of the solution containing $N_{\mathrm{tot}}$ capsomers, we make use of the volume fractions $\phi_{n}$ $n=1,2,3, \ldots, 12,$ which are defined as $\phi_{n}=N_{n} v_{n} / V,$ where $N_{n}$ is the number of partially formed capsids made of $n$ capsomers, $v_{n}$ is the volume of each of these structures, while $V$ is the volume of the solution. The goal of the problem is to compute $\phi_{n}$ for different values of $n,$ as a function of $\Delta \varepsilon$ and $\phi_{\mathrm{T}}=N_{\mathrm{T}} v_{1} / V,$ the total volume fraction for all the capsomers in solution.
(a) Using a lattice model for solution as we have done throughout the book, show that the total free energy of the capsomer solution is
\[
G_{\mathrm{T}}=\sum_{n=1}^{12}\left\{N_{n} \varepsilon_{n}+\frac{V}{v_{n}} k_{\mathrm{B}} T\left[\phi_{n} \ln \phi_{n}+\left(1-\phi_{n}\right) \ln \left(1-\phi_{n}\right)\right]\right\}
\]
Now show that by minimizing this free energy with respect to $N_{n},$ with the constraint that the total number of capsomers is constant (use a Lagrange multiplier to enforce this constraint) and equal to $N_{\mathrm{T}},$ the volume fraction of intermediates of size $n$ is given by
\[
\phi_{n}=\left(\phi_{1}\right)^{n} \mathrm{e}^{-\varepsilon_{n} / k_{\mathrm{B}} T}
\]
To get this result, you will need to use the fact that $\varepsilon_{1}=0$ Finally, show that the constraint on the state variable $N_{n}$ can be rewritten in terms of the volume fractions as
\[
\phi_{\mathrm{T}}=\sum_{n=1}^{12} \phi_{n}
\]
(b) Assume that the only species with significant volume fractions are those of sizes $n=1$ and $n=12 .$ Show that in this case the critical value, $\phi_{C},$ of $\phi_{T}$ for which half of all capsomers are in complete capsids is given by
\[
\ln \left(\phi_{\mathrm{C}} / 2\right)=\frac{\varepsilon_{12}}{11 k_{\mathrm{B}} T}
\]
(c) Carry out a numerical solution for $\phi_{n}, n=1,2, \ldots, 12,$ as a function of $\phi_{\mathrm{T}}$ and $\Delta \varepsilon$. Plot $\phi_{n}$ as a function of $n$ for $\phi_{\mathrm{T}}=\phi_{\mathrm{C}}$ and $\Delta \varepsilon=-1,-5,$ and $-10 k_{\mathrm{B}} T .$ How are the
capsomers distributed among the 12 different structures in each of these cases? What happens to the fraction of capsomers in complete capsids as the total volume fraction is varied from below to above $\phi_{\mathrm{C}},$ in the case $\Delta \varepsilon=-5 k_{\mathrm{B}} T ?$ (Problem courtesy of Mike Hagan.)

Sana Riaz
Sana Riaz
Numerade Educator
03:56

Problem 6

In Section $9.3 .3,$ we computed the Debye length from a toy model of the screening cloud. The idea was to find the width of the cloud that minimizes its free energy. The free energy accounted for the electrostatic energy and the entropy of the charges in the cloud. The electrostatic energy was estimated by assuming a uniform electric field throughout the cloud, as though all the counterions were located at distance $\lambda_{\mathrm{D}}$ from the negatively charged macromolecule. Here we reconsider this estimate by computing the electric field and the electrostatic energy associated with a uniform charge distribution, as shown in Figure 9.16
(a) Compute the electric field inside the screening cloud, $E(x),$ a distance $x$ from the surface of the negatively charged macromolecule, using Gauss' law. Assume that the field in the cloud is along the $x$ -direction, perpendicular to the surface of the macromolecule.
(b) Compute the electrostatic energy associated with the screening cloud using the relation
\[
U=\frac{D \varepsilon_{0}}{2} \int_{\mathrm{cloud}} E^{2} \mathrm{d} V
\]
where the integral runs over the volume of the cloud.
(c) Compute the entropy cost associated with the screening cloud by taking into account the contribution of all the positive and negative ions in the cloud. Then, compute the Debye length as the cloud width that minimizes the cloud free energy. How does this value compare with the one obtained in the chapter?

Sana Riaz
Sana Riaz
Numerade Educator
03:51

Problem 7

(a) Using the linearized Poisson-Boltzmann equation, calculate the positive and negative charge concentrations, $c_{+}(x)$ and $c_{-}(x),$ and the electric potential $V(x)$ at a distance
$x$ from a charged plane in a salty solution. If the charge per unit area on the plane is $\sigma=e / a$, derive a condition on the area $a$ that makes the linear approximation valid. Assume a salt concentration of $c_{\infty}=100 \mathrm{mM}$
(b) Plot the electric potential and the concentrations of positive and negative charges as functions of the distance from the charged plane, assuming that the charge on the plane is one electron per $100 \mathrm{nm}^{2},$ and $c_{\infty}=100 \mathrm{mM}$
(c) Add up all the charges in solution and show that they exactly compensate for those on the charged plane.

Sana Riaz
Sana Riaz
Numerade Educator
03:51

Problem 8

Consider a protein sphere with a radius of $1.8 \mathrm{nm},$ and charge $Q=-10 e,$ in an aqueous solution of $c_{\infty}=0.05 \mathrm{M}$ $\mathrm{NaCl}$ at $25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}$. Consider the small ions as point charges and use the linear approximation to the Poisson-Boltzmann equation.
(a) Fill in the steps leading to Equations 9.70 and $9.72,$ and derive the expression for the potential $V(r)$ of a charged sphere in a salty solution.
(b) What is the surface potential of the protein in units $k_{\mathrm{B}} T / e ?$
(c) What is the concentration of $\mathrm{Na}^{+}$ ions and of $\mathrm{Cl}^{-}$ ions at the surface of the protein?
(d) What is the concentration of $\mathrm{Na}^{+}$ and $\mathrm{Cl}^{-}$ ions at a distance of $0.3 \mathrm{nm}$ from the protein surface? (Adapted from Problem 23.2 of $\mathrm{K}$. Dill and S. Bromberg, Molecular Driving Forces, 2 nd ed. Garland Science, $2011 .$ )

Sana Riaz
Sana Riaz
Numerade Educator
03:51

Problem 9

In the toy model of a protein described in Section $9.3 .2,$ we assumed that a protein can be thought of as a charged sphere in water. Here, we consider the effect of salt on its electrical energy.
(a) Compute the energy of a charged spherical protein of radius $R,$ in water, and in the presence of monovalent salt at concentration $c_{\infty} .$ Assume that the charged residues are uniformly distributed on the surface of the protein.
(b) Redo the calculation leading to the plot in Figure 9.14 Plot the electrical energy of the protein as a function of its radius for different salt concentrations, ranging between $1 \mathrm{mM}$ and $100 \mathrm{mM}$. What conclusion do you draw about the effect of salt on the charged state of a protein?

Sana Riaz
Sana Riaz
Numerade Educator
02:19

Problem 10

Consider a phospholipid bilayer membrane consisting of a mixture of $90 \%$ uncharged lipid and $10 \%$ singly charged acid lipid. Assume $0.68 \mathrm{nm}^{2}$ surface area per lipid head group, and assume further that the charged lipids are uniformly distributed and immobile. The membrane is in contact with an aqueous solution of $\mathrm{NaCl}$ at $25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}$. The salt concentration is $c_{\infty}=100 \mathrm{mM}$
(a) Calculate the areal charge density (that is, charge per unit surface area) of the membrane.
(b) Calculate the surface potential of the membrane.
What is the electrostatic energy (in $k_{\mathrm{B}} T$ units) of binding to the membrane of a trivalent positive ion such as spermidine
(a biologically active polyamine) assuming that:
(c) Binding occurs at the membrane surface?
(d) Owing to steric factors, the charges of the bound spermidine stay in the water $0.5 \mathrm{nm}$ distant from the membrane surface?
(Adapted from Problems 23.6 and 23.7 of $K .$ Dill and $S$. Bromberg, Molecular Driving Forces, 2nd ed. Garland Science, $2011 .)$

Sheh Lit Chang
Sheh Lit Chang
University of Washington
02:34

Problem 11

In Section $9.2 .3,$ we discussed experiments that demonstrate the effect of salts on binding of proteins to DNA. Here we explore this effect in the context of two models, both of a simple ligand-receptor system, where we take into account the charge state and the related electrostatic energy of the relevant proteins. We assume that the charge of the receptor is $+z e$ and the ligand has charge $-z e,$ where $e$ is the elementary charge of the electron. For both models, the state in which the ligand is bound to the receptor is the same and corresponds to a situation where the charges on the two cancel each other out. The difference comes in the unbound state.
(a) Consider a model in which the unbound ligand and the receptor each have $z$ tightly bound monovalent counterions that neutralize their charge. Compute the probability that the ligand is bound to the receptor and the dissociation constant. How does the dissociation constant scale with the roncentration of comnterions?
(b) Next, consider a model in which ligand and receptor in the unbound state are surrounded by a screening cloud of counterions, whose width is given by the Debye screening length $\lambda_{\mathrm{D}}$. What is the scaling of the dissociation constant with the concentration of counterions in this case?
(c) Compare the predictions of the two models with the data shown in Figure $9.3 .$ Which model is favored by the data?

Sana Riaz
Sana Riaz
Numerade Educator
01:16

Problem 12

A neutral protein "carrier" may help an ion to transfer into and cross a lipid membrane.
(a) What is the electrostatic free-energy change when a monovalent ion is transferred from water at $25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}$ to a hydrocarbon solvent with dielectric constant $D=2 ?$ The radius of the ion is $0.2 \mathrm{nm}$
(b) Comment on the ability of the ions to diffuse through lipid bilayers. How has nature solved this problem? How do ions manage to get across? (Adapted from Problem 22.11 of K. Dill and
S. Bromberg, Molecular Driving Forces, 2nd ed. Garland Science, 2011.)

Aditya Sood
Aditya Sood
Numerade Educator