Question

The following arguments depend for their validity on suppressed premises of various kinds. For each of them, list enough suppressed premises to make the argument valid and also to show why it is valid. This might require several suppressed premises of various kinds. EXAMPLE: Carol has no sisters, because all her siblings are brothers. SUPPRESSED Premises: A sister would be a sibling. A brother is not a sister. 1. Britney Spears is under age thirty-five. Therefore, she cannot run for president of the United States. 2. Nixon couldn't have been president in 1950 because he was still in the Senate. 3. 81 is not a prime number, because 81 is divisible by 3 . 4. There's no patient named Rupert here; we have only female patients. 5. Columbus did not discover the New World because the Vikings explored Newfoundland centuries earlier. 6. There must not be any survivors, since they would have been found by now. 7. Lincoln could not have met Washington, because Washington was dead before Lincoln was born. 8. Philadelphia cannot play Los Angeles in the World Series, since they are both in the National League. 9. Mildred must be over forty-three, since she has a daughter who is thirtysix years old. 10. He cannot be a grandfather because he never had children. 11. That's not modern poetry; you can understand it. 12. Harold can't play in the Super Bowl, because he broke his leg. 13. Shaquille must be a basketball player, since he is so tall. 14. Dan is either stupid or very cunning, so he must be stupid. 15. Susan refuses to work on Sundays, which shows that she is lazy and inflexible. 16. Jim told me that Mary is a professor, so she can't be a student, since professors must already have degrees. 17. This burglar alarm won't work unless we are lucky or the burglar uses the front door, so we can't count on it. 18. His natural talents were not enough; he still lost the match because he had not practiced sufficiently.

   The following arguments depend for their validity on suppressed premises of various kinds. For each of them, list enough suppressed premises to make the argument valid and also to show why it is valid. This might require several suppressed premises of various kinds.
EXAMPLE:
Carol has no sisters, because all her siblings are brothers.
SUPPRESSED Premises: A sister would be a sibling.
A brother is not a sister.
1. Britney Spears is under age thirty-five. Therefore, she cannot run for president of the United States.
2. Nixon couldn't have been president in 1950 because he was still in the Senate.
3. 81 is not a prime number, because 81 is divisible by 3 .
4. There's no patient named Rupert here; we have only female patients.
5. Columbus did not discover the New World because the Vikings explored Newfoundland centuries earlier.
6. There must not be any survivors, since they would have been found by now.
7. Lincoln could not have met Washington, because Washington was dead before Lincoln was born.
8. Philadelphia cannot play Los Angeles in the World Series, since they are both in the National League.
9. Mildred must be over forty-three, since she has a daughter who is thirtysix years old.
10. He cannot be a grandfather because he never had children.
11. That's not modern poetry; you can understand it.
12. Harold can't play in the Super Bowl, because he broke his leg.
13. Shaquille must be a basketball player, since he is so tall.
14. Dan is either stupid or very cunning, so he must be stupid.
15. Susan refuses to work on Sundays, which shows that she is lazy and inflexible.
16. Jim told me that Mary is a professor, so she can't be a student, since professors must already have degrees.
17. This burglar alarm won't work unless we are lucky or the burglar uses the front door, so we can't count on it.
18. His natural talents were not enough; he still lost the match because he had not practiced sufficiently.
Show more…
Cengage Advantage Books: Understanding Arguments: An Introduction to Informal Logic
Cengage Advantage Books: Understanding Arguments: An Introduction to Informal Logic
Walter… 9th Edition
Chapter 5, Problem 9 ↓

Instant Answer

verified

Step 1

Step 2: For each argument, determine what additional premises are necessary to support the conclusion and make the argument valid. Step 3: List the suppressed premises clearly, ensuring they logically connect the premises to the conclusion. Step 4: Explain how  Show more…

Show all steps

lock
AceChat toggle button
Close icon
Ace pointing down

Please give Ace some feedback

Your feedback will help us improve your experience

Thumb up icon Thumb down icon
Thanks for your feedback!
Profile picture
The following arguments depend for their validity on suppressed premises of various kinds. For each of them, list enough suppressed premises to make the argument valid and also to show why it is valid. This might require several suppressed premises of various kinds. EXAMPLE: Carol has no sisters, because all her siblings are brothers. SUPPRESSED Premises: A sister would be a sibling. A brother is not a sister. 1. Britney Spears is under age thirty-five. Therefore, she cannot run for president of the United States. 2. Nixon couldn't have been president in 1950 because he was still in the Senate. 3. 81 is not a prime number, because 81 is divisible by 3 . 4. There's no patient named Rupert here; we have only female patients. 5. Columbus did not discover the New World because the Vikings explored Newfoundland centuries earlier. 6. There must not be any survivors, since they would have been found by now. 7. Lincoln could not have met Washington, because Washington was dead before Lincoln was born. 8. Philadelphia cannot play Los Angeles in the World Series, since they are both in the National League. 9. Mildred must be over forty-three, since she has a daughter who is thirtysix years old. 10. He cannot be a grandfather because he never had children. 11. That's not modern poetry; you can understand it. 12. Harold can't play in the Super Bowl, because he broke his leg. 13. Shaquille must be a basketball player, since he is so tall. 14. Dan is either stupid or very cunning, so he must be stupid. 15. Susan refuses to work on Sundays, which shows that she is lazy and inflexible. 16. Jim told me that Mary is a professor, so she can't be a student, since professors must already have degrees. 17. This burglar alarm won't work unless we are lucky or the burglar uses the front door, so we can't count on it. 18. His natural talents were not enough; he still lost the match because he had not practiced sufficiently.
Close icon
Play audio
Feedback
Powered by NumerAI
*

Labs

-

Want to see this concept in action?

NEW

Explore this concept interactively to see how it behaves as you change inputs.

View Labs

*

Key Concepts

-
Necessary Conditions
Necessary conditions are the criteria or assumptions that must be met for the premises to logically entail the conclusion. In arguments with suppressed premises, these conditions are often unspoken but essential for the argument's validity. Making these conditions explicit can reveal whether an argument’s structure is truly sound and if any gaps exist in the reasoning.
Logical Validity
Logical validity is a property of an argument where, if all premises are true, the conclusion must necessarily follow. An argument can be valid even if one or more premises are unspoken, as long as those unstated premises (i.e., the suppressed premises) are in place to connect the reasoning. Thus, evaluating an argument’s validity often involves making these hidden steps explicit.
Deductive Reasoning
Deductive reasoning involves drawing a necessary conclusion from a set of premises. In a deductively valid argument, the conclusion is an inevitable consequence of the premises when they are true. This type of reasoning is central to formal logic and is the basis for analyzing how suppressed premises underpin the logical flow from premises to conclusion.
Suppressed Premises
These are unstated assumptions or background assertions that an argument implicitly relies on. An argument may omit these premises because they are generally accepted or seen as obvious within a particular context. Identifying them can clarify how the explicit premises lead logically to the conclusion, thereby assessing the argument’s validity.
Implicit Assumptions
Implicit assumptions are the underlying ideas that are not formally stated but are necessary for the reasoning to hold. They bridge the gap between the stated premises and the conclusion, ensuring that the logic of the argument is sound. Recognizing these assumptions helps to make the reasoning transparent and allows for a more rigorous evaluation of the argument.

*

Recommended Videos

-
identify-the-fallacy-in-each-of-the-following-critical-thinking-1-most-americans-own-their-own-homes-how-do-i-know-everyone-i-know-owns-their-home-2-taking-drugs-can-impair-your-thinking-joe-00019

1. Most Americans own their own homes. How do I know? Everyone I know owns their home. 2. Taking drugs can impair your thinking. Joe is on drugs, because he takes aspirin every day and aspirin is a drug. So, Joe probably has impaired thinking. 3. People who are high are usually not at their sharpest. If you are not at your sharpest, you shouldn't be climbing mountains. When people climb mountains, they get to a very high altitude. If you are at a high altitude, then by definition you are high. So nobody should climb mountains. 4. Driver to officer: You should let me go without a ticket, because my pet cockroach just died and he was my best friend and I am devastated. 5. Either the economy should be completely free and unregulated, or we should have central planning and government control over every aspect of the economy. But the latter would be intolerable. So, the economy should be free and unregulated. 6. Each individual part of my car weighs less than twenty pounds. So, my car weighs less than twenty pounds. 7. Teenagers earn less, on average, than people in their thirties. Rita is nineteen, Joe is thirty-five. Therefore, Joe earns more than Rita. 8. Rita is a meter maid. Rita is lovely. Probably all meter maids are lovely. 9. In 1965, the average age of the members of the Beatles was twenty-three. Therefore, the Beatles were formed in 1942. 10. Senator Jones says that the threat of terrorism has diminished. But how can you believe what he says? He's been divorced five times. Sheesh.

Need help? Use Ace
Ace is your personal tutor. It breaks down any question with clear steps so you can learn.
Start Using Ace
Ace is your personal tutor for learning
Step-by-step explanations
Instant summaries
Summarize YouTube videos
Understand textbook images or PDFs
Study tools like quizzes and flashcards
Listen to your notes as a podcast
Continue solving this problem
Create a free account to:
  • View full step-by-step solution
  • Ask follow-up questions with Ace AI
  • Save progress and study later
Continue Free
Numerade

Get step-by-step video solution
from top educators

Continue with Clever
or



By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Already have an account? Log In

A free answer
just for you

Watch the video solution with this free unlock.

Numerade

Log in to watch this video
...and 100,000,000 more!


EMAIL

PASSWORD

OR
Continue with Clever