00:01
Okay, we're going to go ahead and solve this problem.
00:05
Now, first i want to note that because this is an estimation problem without using any precise values given from the graph, the answers are going to vary slightly between individuals and how you can do it.
00:20
So i am going to provide two possible solutions that most people might try to do.
00:26
Okay? so the most straightforward way to estimate the area, under the curve here is to see that this is sort of a triangular shape.
00:36
So if you connect the vertices like that, you can see that this is going to be quite of an overestimate, but we're going to be able to calculate the area of that triangle as an upper bound.
00:53
So let's calculate the area of that triangle right there.
00:57
You can see that the height is equal to 85.
01:02
You can see that the horizontal distance is equal to to 5.
01:08
So to calculate the area, it's a triangle, so it's one half base times height.
01:19
And this becomes 212 .5.
01:27
So that's one possible answer that you could do.
01:31
Another thing that i particularly did here is that looking at their grids, 2 .30 seems to be a legitimate point.
01:42
So what i was able to do is to say that, all right, this portion gives you a trapezoid, and this portion gives you a triangle, which seems like it's going to be a much closer approximation.
01:59
Again, it's still going to be an overestimate because this graph, the true graph, is concave up...