00:01
In problem 49, we're going to be using a computer printout of the results of an nova test.
00:11
And the test was using data coming from four different grocery stores or shops.
00:19
And here we're trying to see whether it really matters financially where you shop, where the prices are higher or lower in certain shops.
00:31
And we're going to be looking at the martins tops walmarts and we'regmans so in the first part of the question a we'll be defining the null stating the null and alternative hypothesis and for the null hypothesis we'll say mu one which is the mean price for the first store equals mu two the price of the second store equals mu three for the third stone and mufo for the fourth store.
01:08
So this non -hypothesis states that the prices for four grocery stores are equal.
01:16
So now you proceed to an alternative hypothesis.
01:21
So the alternative hypothesis is the negation of non -labodices where we're going to say that at least one mean is different.
01:29
Or we can say that the prices at the four grocery straws are different or we could just say that the mean amount spent is not the same.
01:54
Okay, now that we have the null and alternative hypothesis stated, we can move on to give the decision and conclusion to the hypothesis test.
02:06
And according to p -value of this printout, we notice that the p -value is greater than the the level of significance alpha so the level of significance here is 0 .05 and the p value is 0 .993 so the p value is large so it's greater than the alpha the level of significance and the decision that we have to make there is fail to reject the null hypothesis so the conclusion that arises from this decision is that there is no sufficient evidence to show that the prices at the four stores are different from the given sample...