00:01
Okay, so here we have a question that asks about stabilizing selection.
00:05
So, stabilizing selection is a form of selection that favors the intermediate phenotype, as opposed to the two extreme ends.
00:14
So we're going to look at each example presented by the question and see whether it fits the example of stabilizing selection.
00:21
So the first one says that over time, equus developed strength, intelligence, speed, and durable binding.
00:27
So this makes sense, but if we think about it, is it stabilizing selection? it wouldn't be.
00:34
It's actually favoring one extreme end of the, one extreme end of all these phenotypes in terms of greater amounts of strength, greater intelligence, faster speed, and durable grinding teeth.
00:47
It would all be heading in one direction in terms of selection for these specific traits.
00:53
And this is actually directional selection.
00:55
So a would be incorrect.
00:57
B says british land snails mainly have two different phenotypes.
01:01
So that is actually an example of disruptive selection where they're favoring two extreme ends of the phenotype and the intermediate phenotype is the least common.
01:13
Stabilizing selection would mean that there is mainly one phenotype which is the intermediate.
01:17
So b would be incorrect.
01:19
C says swiss starlings usually weigh four or five eggs, thereby increasing their chances of more offspring...