Let S be a nonempty subset of ?. Prove that if a number u in ? has the properties: (i) for every n ? ? the number u - 1/n is not an upper bound of S, and (ii) for every n ? ? the number u + 1/n is an upper bound of S, then u = sup S.
Added by Brandon G.
Close
Step 1
This means that there exists an element in S that is greater than u - CN for every CN. Show more…
Show all steps
Your feedback will help us improve your experience
Adi S and 95 other Calculus 3 educators are ready to help you.
Ask a new question
Labs
Want to see this concept in action?
Explore this concept interactively to see how it behaves as you change inputs.
Key Concepts
Recommended Videos
Let S be a nonempty subset of ℝ that is bounded above. Prove that sup S = -inf{-s: s ∈ S}.
Sri K.
Let S be a nonempty set of real numbers that is bounded above, and let s be its least upper bound. Prove that there exists a sequence {a_n} such that each a_n belongs to S and s is the limit of the sequence {a_n}.
An upper bound u of a non-empty set S in R is the supremum of S if and only if for every € > 0, there exists an s € such that u - € < s
Recommended Textbooks
Calculus: Early Transcendentals
Thomas Calculus
Transcript
18,000,000+
Students on Numerade
Trusted by students at 8,000+ universities
Watch the video solution with this free unlock.
EMAIL
PASSWORD