4) Considering your answers in questions 1, 2, and 3, above, do you find that sufficient agency authority existed such that Juancho Herran is bound by Bill Freeman's actions (entering into a valid contract or modifying an existing one to purchase the additional CD sleeves at a higher cost) and is liable to Rob Vasquez? Yes / No (record your reasoning)
5) If you believe that an agency relationship existed between Bill Freeman and Juancho Herran, from Rob Vasquez's perspective, what type of agency relationship existed: Disclosed, Undisclosed, or Partially Disclosed, and why?
• Think about how this might affect Juancho Herran's contractual liability to Rob Vasquez, as well as Bill Freedman's potential liability.
6) If you believe that an agency relationship existed between Bill Freeman and Juancho Herran, what type of agent is Bill Freeman: a special agent, sub-agent, broker, factor, dual agent, general agent, or gratuitous agent, and why?
7) If you believe that an agency relationship existed between Bill Freeman and Juancho Herran, think about what duties the agent owes the principal and what duties the principal owes the agent. Did Bill Freeman adequately perform the duties an agent owes a principal, or did he perform them negligently, and if the latter, what if any consequences does that present to Freeman and Herran? Be prepared to discuss these questions.