Required information [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.] Reauditing Financial Statements Margaret Dairy is a CPA and the managing partner of Dairy and Cheese, a regional CPA firm located in northwest Wisconsin. She just left a meeting with a well-respected regional credit union headquartered in her hometown. Margaret was asked whether her firm would be willing to reaudit the previous years' financial statements and, subsequently, conduct an audit of the current years' financials. This is the first time Margaret has been asked to conduct a reaudit, although she realizes it has become more common as a result of problems like Enron and WorldCom experienced. Some companies switching auditors have elected to have the new audit firm re-examine prior-period financial statements because of concerns about the quality of the earlier audit. On her way back to the office, Margaret calls her brother Mark, who is a Senior Audit Manager at a firm in Margaret's hometown, to share her good news. She tells him that doing the audit work for the two years will increase her firm's revenue by 10 percent. Mark is taken aback by the news. The new client was a client of Mark's firm. He did not know the firm had lost the client and it might be picked up by Dairy & Cheese. Assume Margaret's firm discovers undetected fraud in the previous years' financial statements, what should she do?
Added by Roberto R.
Close
Step 1
Step 1: **Identify the Fraud** - Confirm the presence of fraud in the previous years' financial statements through thorough investigation and evidence collection. Show more…
Show all steps
Your feedback will help us improve your experience
Akash M and 91 other Principles of Accounting educators are ready to help you.
Ask a new question
Labs
Want to see this concept in action?
Explore this concept interactively to see how it behaves as you change inputs.
Recommended Videos
Scenario: Geoff is working at an accountancy firm called Getsted, providing taxation advice. Joan is a new client who is setting up a business and requires advice on establishing it. The one-hour meeting has gone overtime, and another client is waiting. As they are leaving the room, Joan asks about the tax deductibility of a holiday house she and her husband own. Geoff, wanting to see the next client, hurriedly gives her advice that holiday homes are tax deductible. However, this is not completely correct, as the ATO (Australian Taxation Office) requires accurate records of income and expenses, as well as evidence of the property being rented or genuinely available for rent at market rates. Based on this information, Joan prepares her own personal tax return and lodges it. The Tax Office, after using new technology, data matching, and checking social media, finds that her claims are not legitimate. Joan receives notification from the ATO that she has a tax liability of $22,000. She is furious and blames Geoff for not correctly advising her. She is seeking advice on whether she can sue him. What does she need to establish to successfully sue Geoff? Using the scenario above, answer the following questions related to applying the law of negligence. Q1. Identify and discuss each of the four (4) elements of negligence in relation to the dispute in the scenario above. In your answer, make sure you refer to both negligence and negligent misstatement and include details of any common law cases. Q2. Suggest a way Geoff can protect himself from any liability.
Jennifer S.
A good comment about the response of this question. Andy Anderson works in a public accounting firm. He was recently promoted to manager and hopes to move up the ladder to partner one day. Anderson was contacted by management at Positively Positive, Inc. The management of Positively Positive asked Anderson to prepare a bid to audit Positive's financial statements. In discussing the audit fee, Positive's management suggests a fee structure in which the fee depends on the reported profit of Positive. The higher the reported profit, the higher the audit fee to Anderson's firm. Apply the ethical decision-making process to this situation. 1) Is there an ethical concern? If so, what is it? 2) What options are available? List at least three options and the potential consequences of each. 3) What should Andy Anderson do? Justify your response. Yes, there is an ethical concern here. Andy has the incentive to move up the ladder of the company and getting a better Audit Fee by falsely reporting their profit could do that for Andy. Three options for Andy: 1) He could file the correct reports and get the proper fee. Depending on how much the profit is, it could lead to management not being happy with the results, limiting Andy's potential growth and possibly even demoting him. 2) He could lie on the reported profits, leading to a better fee and also a possible promotion. The consequences of this could be Andy gets caught, fired, and possibly even runs into legal troubles. 3) He could go to his higher-ups and tell them the situation so they can decide how best to proceed. This could lead to them not respecting Andy for his lack of initiative and also possibly lead to the consequences of choice number 2 if management decided to go through with it. I believe that the best choice for Andy is to just file the correct reports and pay the fee given. The temptation of lying just to get a better fee is far too risky and could lead to some serious repercussions. If Andy just does his job well over time, his chances of moving up in the company seem far better than if he decides to be unethical to try and get a better price.
Madhur L.
help
Brendan H.
Recommended Textbooks
Horngren’s Cost Accounting
Cost Accounting A Managerial Emphasis
Principles of Accounting Volume 1: Financial Accounting
Transcript
Watch the video solution with this free unlock.
EMAIL
PASSWORD