During the audit of a technology company, the auditor notices that the company's revenue recognition practices appear aggressive and may not comply fully with accounting standards. The auditor is concerned that this could misrepresent the company’s financial position. What should the auditor do to address the concern over the aggressive revenue recognition practices? Ignore the issue as it is a common practice in the tech industry Discuss the findings with the client and recommend changes to their accounting policies Immediately issue a qualified audit opinion Report the issue to the client's shareholders without further discussion
Added by Dawn H.
Step 1
Step 1: Gather Evidence The auditor should collect and analyze relevant documentation and evidence regarding the company's revenue recognition practices to understand the extent of the aggressive accounting and its compliance with applicable accounting standards. Show more…
Show all steps
Your feedback will help us improve your experience
Akash M and 71 other Principles of Accounting educators are ready to help you.
Ask a new question
Labs
Want to see this concept in action?
Explore this concept interactively to see how it behaves as you change inputs.
Recommended Videos
The following are independent situations that have occurred in your public accounting firm, Arthur Hurdman: Case 1: During the internal inspection by a regional office of Arthur Hurdman, one of its clients, Wildcat Oil Suppliers, was selected for review. The reviewers questioned the thoroughness of inventory obsolescence procedures, especially in light of the depressed state of the oil exploration industry at the time. They believed that specific substantive procedures, which they considered appropriate, were not performed by your audit team. Case 2: Top Stove, one of your clients, installed an automated system in July 2017 to process part of its accounting transactions. You completed the audit of Top Stove's December 31, 2017, statements on February 15, 2018. During the April 2018 review work on Top Stove's first quarter financial information, you discovered that during the audit of the 2017 statements, only the manual records had been investigated in the search for unrecorded liabilities. Required: a. Without regard to the specific situation given, answer the following questions: 1. What are the proper steps auditors should take if it is discovered, after the report date, that an important substantive procedure was omitted? 2. How are auditors' decisions affected if, after review of the audit documentation, they determine that other substantive procedures produced the sufficient appropriate audit evidence? 3. If, in subsequently applying the omitted procedure, auditors become aware of material new information that should have been disclosed in the financial statements, how should they proceed? b. Describe the proper action to take in each of the preceding situations, given the following additional information: Case 1: You thoroughly consider the scope of the audit of Wildcat Oil Suppliers and have made a detailed review of the audit documentation. You have concluded that sufficient compensating procedures were conducted to support the valuation of inventory. Case 2: Your subsequent investigation of the information system's records of Top Stove revealed that material liabilities were not recorded as of December 31.
Akash M.
Text: Discussion: Maximizing Revenue Scenario: You have been hired to audit a nationally recognized financial guru. She sells subscriptions to her online coaching. Customers pay for a four-year service contract in advance. She has been recording the full payment as sales when the payment is received. During the year under review, she recorded $550,000 in sales under these contracts. In addition, she sells books on her website, but at the end of the year, she made a large shipment to a distributor and recorded it as a sale for the full retail amount of the shipment of $265,000. The distributor has the right to return any unsold merchandise. Also, she ran a promotion at the end of the year, a 90-day money-back guarantee, and she sold $180,000 of books under that promotion. Total revenues for the year included cash for books and services in the amount of $310,000 in addition to the above, for a total of $1.305 million in sales against about half a million of expenses (things like administrative costs, personnel, travel, promotion, and printing costs). So, she's showing a profit of over $800,000 before taxes. She is applying to borrow money to buy her own office complex, and several investors are eager to put money into her growing empire, but they want the financials reviewed first. Discussion Questions: 1. What are the legal, ethical, and accounting issues in this scenario? 2. What suggestions would you make, just based on this information? What other information would you want to have? 3. How would you present those suggestions to the owner? 4. If the owner declined to implement any of your suggestions, would you sign off on the financials (approve)? Why or why not?
Find the report (from 2013 or later) of a publicly held company with an audit opinion that has an Adverse Opinion, a Disclaimer of Opinion, or a Qualified Opinion related to a Going Concern Issue. Explain the going concern audit opinion and the "qualified" audit opinion. Explain how the opinions differ based upon IFRS and GAAP and the implications of SAS 126. Include the audited financial statements. Highlight the opinion. Explain what happened to the company including: - The stock price both before, during, and after the report was issued. - What happened the following year. - Anything else interesting.
Recommended Textbooks
Horngren’s Cost Accounting
Cost Accounting A Managerial Emphasis
Principles of Accounting Volume 1: Financial Accounting
Transcript
Watch the video solution with this free unlock.
EMAIL
PASSWORD