It seems that genetic engineering is truly about to go from science fiction to science fact. Advances in the field, such as CRISPR technology, show us that fixing a human being on the level of genetic coding is not a mere possibility but a practical reality soon to be fully realized. This means that diseases caused by genetic coding can now be "corrected" by recoding or re-editing the genetics involved. Diseases such as Sickle-cell anemia, Tay-Sachs syndrome, or breast cancer can be coded out of an individual's physical existence in utero.
Most people would probably agree that such technology should be used to rid our species of deadly, painful diseases. But what about using it to "customize" a child or improve a child's well-being by manipulating genetic code to improve health, beauty, and/or intelligence? Do you think this is morally acceptable from a Kantian point of view? Discuss with some reference to the Second Formulation of the Categorical Imperative. By the way, you don't have to agree with Kant's point of view, just show that you understand Kantian ethics.