Problem

Find the limit or show that it does not exist. …

View

Problem 19 Easy Difficulty

Find the limit or show that it does not exist.

$ \displaystyle \lim_{t \to \infty}\frac{\sqrt{t} + t^2}{2t - t^2} $

Answer

-1

Watch More Solved Questions in Chapter 2

Problem 1

Problem 2

Problem 3

Problem 4

Problem 5

Problem 6

Problem 7

Problem 8

Problem 9

Problem 10

Problem 11

Problem 12

Problem 13

Problem 14

Problem 15

Problem 16

Problem 17

Problem 18

Problem 19

Problem 20

Problem 21

Problem 22

Problem 23

Problem 24

Problem 25

Problem 26

Problem 27

Problem 28

Problem 29

Problem 30

Problem 31

Problem 32

Problem 33

Problem 34

Problem 35

Problem 36

Problem 37

Problem 38

Problem 39

Problem 40

Problem 41

Problem 42

Problem 43

Problem 44

Problem 45

Problem 46

Problem 47

Problem 48

Problem 49

Problem 50

Problem 51

Problem 52

Problem 53

Problem 54

Problem 55

Problem 56

Problem 57

Problem 58

Problem 59

Problem 60

Problem 61

Problem 62

Problem 63

Problem 64

Problem 65

Problem 66

Problem 67

Problem 68

Problem 69

Problem 70

Problem 71

Problem 72

Problem 73

Problem 74

Problem 75

Problem 76

Problem 77

Problem 78

Problem 79

Problem 80

Problem 81

Video Transcript

All right. So we want to find this limit or show that does not exist. Um And as usual, some people like to do low petals rule here or talk about end behavior. Um I think the best way uh to do limits is to use algebra because limits have to exist before um before derivatives do so lumpy tiles rule doesn't make any sense. You may or may not know that already. So this is really big. The top is really big. The bottom is really big or maybe negative. Really big. I can't tell I'm just going to stop things from being big. So I'm going to divide top and bottom by T squared because that's the thing that's getting big the fastest. Okay, so what happens when I do that? Well, T T is like T to the one half. Right. So this is Um won over now. T to the 3/2. If you just use expanded rules. Um you can think of it as teeth. The negative three halves and then write it as 1/2 to the three halves. Okay, Plus T squared over T squared is one divided by um to T over T squared is two over tea and then minus T squared over two squared is one. I'm just going to write this one more time as something slightly different. This three halves is kind of strange. So one over T to the three halves plus one. And why do I want this? Usually don't want fractions infractions, but um, I only need one theorem for something getting big as T gets big one over T gets small, right one divided by a huge number is always going to be really, really small, as the number gets huger and huger, that goes towards zero, that's what that means. Okay, now, I just have that theorem everywhere in here, I have one divided by big number small, raised, the power of three halves is still small, so that limit, the limit of that part is zero, so then the top is zero plus one is one, divided by the bottom is two times this part goes to zero minus one, it's negative. So my answer is negative one, and I think that's the cleanest way to think about a limit like this.

Stark L.

University of Washington

Related Courses

Calculus 1 / AB

Calculus: Early Transcendentals

Chapter 2

Limits and Derivatives

Section 6

Limits at Infinity: Horizontal Asymptotes

Problem