6.10 Calculate enthalpies of formation for the respective complexes from the stability constants tabulated below.
(a)
\begin{tabular}{lccc}
Monothiocyanatouranium(IV) : & & & \\
\( \mathrm{T} / \mathrm{K} \) & 283.2 & 298.2 & 313.2 \\
\( K_{1} / \mathrm{dm}^{3} \mathrm{~mol}^{-1} \) & 60 & 33 & 20
\end{tabular}
(b)
Mono(ethane-1,2-diamine)nickel(II) :
\{The answer is \( -27 \mathrm{~kJ} \mathrm{~mol}^{-1} \) \}
\[
\begin{array}{lrrrr}
\mathrm{T} / \mathrm{K} & 283.2 & 293.2 & 303.2 & 313.2 \\
\log _{10}\left\{K_{1} / \mathrm{dm}^{3} \mathrm{~mol}^{-1}\right\} & 7.74 & 7.52 & 7.27 & 7.04
\end{array}
\]
\{The answer is \( -38 \mathrm{~kJ} \mathrm{~mol}^{-1} \) \}
(c)
\[
\begin{array}{lcc}
\text { Monocysteinatomercury(II) : } & & \\
\mathrm{T} / \mathrm{K} & 285.2 & 298.2 \\
\log _{10}\left\{K_{1} / \mathrm{dm}^{3} \mathrm{~mol}^{-1}\right\} & 45.4 & 43.6
\end{array}
\]
(d) Monoacetatomercury(II) :
\begin{tabular}{lccc}
\( \mathrm{T} / \mathrm{K} \) & 293.2 & 300.2 & 307.2 \\
\( K_{1} / \mathrm{dm}^{3} \mathrm{~mol}^{-1} \) & 3600 & 3330 & 3130
\end{tabular}
(e)
\begin{tabular}{lccc}
Monothiocyanatoneodymium(III) : & & \\
\( \mathrm{T} / \mathrm{K} \) & 298.2 & 313.2 & 328.2 \\
\( \log _{10}\left\{K_{\mathrm{l}} / \mathrm{dm}^{3} \mathrm{~mol}^{-1}\right\} \) & 0.81 & 0.61 & 0.47 \\
Monothiocyanatonickel(II) : & & & \\
\( \mathrm{T} / \mathrm{K} \) & 288.2 & 298.2 & 308.2 \\
\( \log _{10}\left\{K_{\mathrm{l}} / \mathrm{dm}^{3} \mathrm{~mol}^{-1}\right\} \) & 1.34 & 1.24 & 1.17
\end{tabular}
Compare the relative values for the three thiocyanate complexes, for the two nickel complexes, and for the two mercury complexes; comment on your comparisons.