Perhaps the chief conclusion to be reached from the discussion of reaction mechanisms in this chapter is that four-coordinate planar complexes react predominantly by an associative mechanism, whereas octahedral complexes react predominantly by dissociative pathways. The question that is now of interest is the mechanism of substitution in five-coordinate complexes. Clearly, both associative and dissociative mechanisms are possible, since a five-coordinate complex can potentially either add or lose a ligand. Some research has recently been published on such reactions, and this question concerns one of those publications.
The replacement of a phosphine ligand on an iron- or cobalt-dithiolene complex proceeds according to the stoichiometry:
figure cant copy
a. For a dissociative mechanism, the reactions involved would be
$$
\begin{aligned}
& \mathrm{M}\left(\mathrm{S}_2 \mathrm{C}_2 \mathrm{Ph}_2\right)_2 \mathrm{X} \quad \stackrel{k_1}{\underset{k_2}{=}} \mathrm{M}\left(\mathrm{S}_2 \mathrm{C}_2 \mathrm{Ph}_2\right)_2+\mathrm{X} \\
& \mathrm{M}\left(\mathrm{S}_2 \mathrm{C}_2 \mathrm{Ph}_2\right)_2+\mathrm{L} \stackrel{k_3}{\longrightarrow} \mathrm{M}\left(\mathrm{S}_2 \mathrm{C}_2 \mathrm{Ph}_2\right)_2 \mathrm{~L}
\end{aligned}
$$
Write the rate law for this mechanism, assuming that the four-coordinate intermediate is in a steady state. What is the expression for $k_{\text {obs }}$ when excess $L$ is used (that is, you operate under pseudo-first order conditions)? To what does this expression reduce when $k_3 k_2$ ?
b. For an associative mechanism, the reactions involved would be
$$
\mathrm{M}\left(\mathrm{S}_2 \mathrm{C}_2 \mathrm{Ph}_2\right)_2 \mathrm{X}+\mathrm{L} \stackrel{k_2}{\stackrel{k_1}{\rightleftharpoons}} \mathrm{M}\left(\mathrm{S}_2 \mathrm{C}_2 \mathrm{Ph}_2\right)_2 \mathrm{XL} \xrightarrow{k_1} \mathrm{M}\left(\mathrm{S}_2 \mathrm{C}_2 \mathrm{Ph}_2\right)_2 \mathrm{~L}+\mathrm{X}
$$
Assuming steady state conditions for the six-coordinate intermediate, write a rate law for the associative mechanism. Again assume pseudo-first order conditions in $L$ and write the expression for $k_{\text {obs }}$
c. Given below is a plot of $k_{\text {obs }}$ vs. [L] for the reaction of $\mathrm{Co}\left(\mathrm{S}_2 \mathrm{C}_2 \mathrm{Ph}_2\right)_2 \mathrm{PPh}_3+\mathrm{L}$. When $\mathrm{L}=\mathrm{P}(\mathrm{OEt})_3, k_{\text {obs }}=0.05+42.5[\mathrm{~L}]$
figure cant copy
From this plot, and the fact that added $\mathrm{X}$ (the leaving group) has a small effect on the reactions of the cobalt complex, what can you conclude about the mechanism of the reaction? That is, is the reaction strictly dissociative or strictly associative, or are both pathways used? If both pathways are used, which predominates? [If you wish further information on reactions of five-coordinate complexes, consult the following, more recent references: D. A. Sweigart and P. Heidtmann, J. C. S. Chem. Commun., 556 (1973); J. C. S. Dalton, 1686 (1975).]