• Home
  • Textbooks
  • Quarks And Leptons. An Introductory Course In Modern Particle Physics
  • The Structure of Hadrons

Quarks And Leptons. An Introductory Course In Modern Particle Physics

Francis Halzen, Alan D. Martin

Chapter 8

The Structure of Hadrons - all with Video Answers

Educators


Chapter Questions

02:15

Problem 1

It is useful practice of the techniques developed in the previous chapters to derive (8.3) and (8.4). We outline the various steps below. The electromagnetic field due to $Z e \rho(\mathbf{x})$ is $A^{\mu}=(\phi, \mathbf{0})$ where, using (6.59),
$$
\nabla^{2} \phi=-Z e \rho(\mathbf{x})
$$
Use (6.4) and (6.6) to show that the scattering amplitude is (see also Section 7.1)
$$
T_{f i}=-i 2 \pi \delta\left(E_{f}-E_{i}\right)\left(-e \bar{u}_{f} \gamma_{0} u_{i}\right) \int e^{i \mathbf{q} \cdot \mathbf{x}} \phi(\mathbf{x}) d^{3} x
$$
Justify
$$
\int e^{i \mathbf{q} \cdot \mathbf{x}} \nabla^{2} \boldsymbol{\phi} d^{3} x=-|\mathbf{q}|^{2} \int e^{i \mathbf{q} \cdot \mathbf{x}} \boldsymbol{\phi} d^{3} x
$$

Penny Riley
Penny Riley
Numerade Educator
07:24

Problem 2

Show that if the electron beam is replaced by a beam of "point" spinless particles, the only change is that factor (8.7) is replaced by $4 E^{2}$. This raises a question: why does the electron spin make no difference in the nonrelativistic limit, $v \rightarrow 0$ ? The remarks following (6.13) are the clue.

Abid Hussain
Abid Hussain
Numerade Educator
03:52

Problem 3

By considering the electron helicity, explain why you would anticipate the $\cos ^{2}(\theta / 2)$ behavior of factor (8.7) in the extreme relativistic limit, see Section 6.6.
By virtue of the normalization condition, (8.2),
$$
F(0) \equiv 1 \text {. }
$$ If $|\mathbf{q}|$ is not too large, we can expand the exponential in (8.3), giving
$$
\begin{aligned}
F(\mathbf{q}) &=\int\left(1+i \mathbf{q} \cdot \mathbf{x}-\frac{(\mathbf{q} \cdot \mathbf{x})^{2}}{2}+\cdots\right) \rho(\mathbf{x}) d^{3} x \\
&=1-\frac{1}{6}|\mathbf{q}|^{2}\left\langle r^{2}\right\rangle+\cdots,
\end{aligned}
$$
where we have assumed that $\rho$ is spherically symmetric, that is, a function of $r \equiv|\mathbf{x}|$ alone. The small-angle scattering therefore just measures the mean square radius $\left\langle r^{2}\right\rangle$ of the charge cloud. This is because in the small $|\mathbf{q}|$ limit the photon in Fig. $8.1$ is soft and with its large wavelength can resolve only the size of the charge distribution $\rho(r)$ and is not sensitive to its detailed structure.

Salamat Ali
Salamat Ali
Numerade Educator
09:41

Problem 4

If the charge distribution $\rho(r)$ has an exponential form, $e^{-m r}$, show, using (8.3), that the form factor
$$
F(|\mathbf{q}|)=\left(1-\frac{q^{2}}{m^{2}}\right)^{-2}
$$
with $q^{2}=-|\mathbf{q}|^{2}$.

Rajesh Kumar
Rajesh Kumar
Numerade Educator
02:35

Problem 5

Show that current conservation, $\partial_{\mu} J^{\mu}=0$, rules out $\left(p-p^{\prime}\right)^{\mu}$ as a possible four-vector. Why do we not show a term involving $\left(p+p^{\prime}\right)^{\mu}$ in (8.13)?

Frank Lin
Frank Lin
Numerade Educator
03:52

Problem 6

Show that $p \cdot q$ is not an independent scalar variable by expressing it in terms of the variable $q^{2}$.

For $q^{2} \rightarrow 0$, that is, when we probe with long-wavelength photons, it does not nake any difference that the proton has structure at the order of 1 fermi. We ffectively see a particle of charge $e$ and magnetic moment $(1+\kappa) e / 2 M$, where the anomalous moment, is measured to be 1.79. The factors in (8.13) must herefore be chosen so that in this limit
$$
F_{1}(0)=1, \quad F_{2}(0)=1
$$
The corresponding values for the neutron are $F_{1}(0)=0, F_{2}(0)=1$, and experinentally $\kappa_{n}=-1.91$. If we use (8.13) to calculate the differential cross section for electron-proton elastic scattering, we find an expression similar to $(8.10)$ :
$$
\begin{aligned}
\left.\frac{d \sigma}{d \Omega}\right|_{\mathrm{lab}}=\left(\frac{\alpha^{2}}{4 E^{2} \sin ^{4} \frac{\theta}{2}}\right) & \frac{E^{\prime}}{E}\left\{\left(F_{1}^{2}-\frac{\kappa^{2} q^{2}}{4 M^{2}} F_{2}^{2}\right) \cos ^{2} \frac{\theta}{2}\right.\\
&\left.-\frac{q^{2}}{2 M^{2}}\left(F_{1}+\kappa F_{2}\right)^{2} \sin ^{2} \frac{\theta}{2}\right\}
\end{aligned}
$$

Salamat Ali
Salamat Ali
Numerade Educator
02:41

Problem 7

Show that the proton transition current, $J^{\mu}(x)$ of ( $8.12$ ), can be rewritten in the form
$$
J^{\mu}(0)=e \bar{u}\left(p^{\prime}\right)\left[\gamma^{\mu}\left(F_{1}+\kappa F_{2}\right)-\frac{\left(p^{\mu}+p^{\prime \mu}\right)}{2 M} \kappa F_{2}\right] u(p) .
$$
Evaluate $J^{\mu}(0) \equiv(\rho, \mathbf{J})$ in the Breit frame $\left(\mathbf{p}^{\prime}=-\mathbf{p}\right)$. There is no energy
transferred to the proton in this frame, and it behaves as if it had bounced off a brick wall, see Fig. 8.3. If the $z$ axis is chosen along $\mathbf{p}$ and helicity spinors are used, show that
$$
\begin{aligned}
\rho &=2 M e G_{E}\left(q^{2}\right) & & \text { for } \lambda=-\lambda^{\prime}, \\
J_{1} \pm i J_{2} &=\mp 2|\mathbf{q}| e G_{M}\left(q^{2}\right) & & \text { for } \lambda=\lambda^{\prime}=\mp \frac{1}{2},
\end{aligned}
$$
and that all other matrix elements are zero; $\lambda$ and $\lambda^{\prime}$ denote the initial and final proton helicities, respectively. Determine the corresponding values of the helicity of the virtual photon.

In generalizing the form factor of Section 8.1, we have replaced $F(|\mathbf{q}|)$ by $F\left(q^{2}\right)$. However, as long as $|\mathbf{q}|^{2} \ll M^{2}$, we can take over the Fourier transform interpretation of Section 8.1.

Breanna Ollech
Breanna Ollech
Numerade Educator
09:37

Problem 8

Show that for $|\mathbf{q}|^{2} \ll M^{2}$, the form factors $G_{E}$ and $G_{M}$ are the Fourier transforms of the proton's charge and magnetic moment distributions, respectively.
$G_{E}$ and $G_{M}$ are referred to as the electric and magnetic form factors, respectively. The data on the angular dependence of ep $\rightarrow$ ep scattering can be used to separate $G_{E}, G_{M}$ at different values of $q^{2}$, see (8.17). The result for $G_{E}\left(q^{2}\right)$ is shown in Fig. 8.4. $G_{M}\left(q^{2}\right)$ has the same $q^{2}$ dependence. A closer look at Fig. $8.4$ reveals that
$$
G_{E}\left(q^{2}\right) \approx\left(1-\frac{q^{2}}{0.71}\right)^{-2} \quad\left(\text { in units of } \mathrm{GeV}^{2}\right)
$$
The behavior for small $-q^{2}$ can be used to determine the residual terms in the expansion of (8.9). In particular, the mean square proton charge radius is
$$
\left\langle r^{2}\right\rangle=6\left(\frac{d G_{E}\left(q^{2}\right)}{d q^{2}}\right)_{q^{2}-0}=\left(0.81 \times 10^{-13} \mathrm{~cm}\right)^{2} .
$$
The same radius of about $0.8 \mathrm{fm}$ is obtained for the magnetic moment distribution. Using the result of Exercise 8.4, we conclude that the charge distribution of the nucleon has an exponential shape in configuration space.

Robert Zaballa
Robert Zaballa
Numerade Educator
07:28

Problem 9

Show that indeed $L_{\mu \nu}^{e}=L_{\nu \mu}^{e}$ and that
$$
q^{\mu} L_{\mu \nu}^{e}=q^{\nu} L_{\mu \nu}^{e}=0
$$

Aidan Mcnabb
Aidan Mcnabb
Numerade Educator
33:09

Problem 10

Show that current conservation at the hadronic vertex requires
$$
q_{\mu} W^{\mu \nu}=q_{\nu} W^{\mu \nu}=0
$$
The proof may be left until after (8.39); it follows from $\partial_{\mu} \tilde{J}^{\mu}=0$. As a result of (8.26), verify that
$$
\begin{aligned}
&W_{5}=-\frac{p \cdot q}{q^{2}} W_{2} \\
&W_{4}=\left(\frac{p \cdot q}{q^{2}}\right)^{2} W_{2}+\frac{M^{2}}{q^{2}} W_{1}
\end{aligned}
$$
Thus, only two of the four inelastic structure functions of (8.24) are indepenlent; so we may write
$$
W^{\mu \nu}=W_{1}\left(-g^{\mu \nu}+\frac{q^{\mu} q^{\nu}}{q^{2}}\right)+W_{2} \frac{1}{M^{2}}\left(p^{\mu}-\frac{p \cdot q}{q^{2}} q^{\mu}\right)\left(p^{\nu}-\frac{p \cdot q}{q^{2}} q^{\nu}\right),
$$
where the $W_{i}$ 's are functions of the Lorentz scalar variables that can be constructed from the four-momenta at the hadronic vertex. Unlike elastic scattering, there are two independent variables, and we choose
$$
q^{2} \quad \text { and } \quad \nu \equiv \frac{p \cdot q}{M} .
$$
The invariant mass $W$ of the final hadronic system is related to $\nu$ and $q^{2}$ by
$$
W^{2}=(p+q)^{2}=M^{2}+2 M \nu+q^{2} .
$$

PK
Pramod Kumar
Numerade Educator
02:28

Problem 11

It is common to replace $\nu$ and $q^{2}$ by the dimensionless variables
$$
x=\frac{-q^{2}}{2 p \cdot q}=\frac{-q^{2}}{2 M \nu}, \quad y=\frac{p \cdot q}{p \cdot k}
$$
where the four-momenta are shown on Fig. 8.5. Show that the allowed kinematic region for ep $\rightarrow \mathrm{eX}$ is $0 \leq x \leq 1$ and $0 \leq y \leq 1$. Sketch this physical region in the $\nu, q^{2}$ plane and check your answer with Fig. 9.3.

Amit Srivastava
Amit Srivastava
Numerade Educator
03:33

Problem 12

Show that in the rest frame of the target proton,
$$
\nu=E-E^{\prime}, \quad y=\frac{E-E^{\prime}}{E}
$$
where $E$ and $E^{\prime}$ are the initial and final electron energies, respectively.
Evaluation of the cross section for ep $\rightarrow \mathrm{eX}$ is a straightforward repetition of the same calculation for $\mathrm{e}^{-} \mu^{-} \rightarrow \mathrm{e}^{-} \mu^{-}$(or ep $\rightarrow$ ep) scattering with the substitution of $W_{\mu \nu}$, given by $(8.27)$, for $L_{\mu \nu}^{\text {muon }}$ (or $L_{\mu \nu}^{p}$ ). Using the expression (6.25) for $\left(L^{e}\right)^{\mu \nu}$ and noting (8.25), we find
$$
\left(L^{e}\right)^{\mu \nu} W_{\mu \nu}=4 W_{1}\left(k \cdot k^{\prime}\right)+\frac{2 W_{2}}{M^{2}}\left[2(p \cdot k)\left(p \cdot k^{\prime}\right)-M^{2} k \cdot k^{\prime}\right] .
$$
In the laboratory frame, this becomes
$$
\left(L^{e}\right)^{\mu \nu} W_{\mu \nu}=4 E E^{\prime}\left\{\cos ^{2} \frac{\theta}{2} W_{2}\left(\nu, q^{2}\right)+\sin ^{2} \frac{\theta}{2} 2 W_{1}\left(\nu, q^{2}\right)\right\}
$$
see (6.44). By including the flux factor, (4.32), and the phase space factor for the outgoing electron, (4.24), we can obtain the inclusive differential cross section for inelastic electron-proton scattering, ep $\rightarrow \mathrm{eX}$,
$$
d \sigma=\frac{1}{4\left((k \cdot p)^{2}-m^{2} M^{2}\right)^{1 / 2}}\left\{\frac{e^{4}}{q^{4}}\left(L^{e}\right)^{\mu \nu} W_{\mu \nu} 4 \pi M\right\} \frac{d^{3} k^{\prime}}{2 E^{\prime}(2 \pi)^{3}}
$$
where $\overline{|\mathscr{T}|^{2}}$ is given by the expression in the braces [recall (6.18)]. The extra factor of $4 \pi M$ arises because we have adopted the standard convention for the normalization of $W^{\mu \nu}$. Inserting (8.32) in (8.33) yields
$$
\left.\frac{d \sigma}{d E^{\prime} d \Omega}\right|_{\mathrm{lab}}=\frac{\alpha^{2}}{4 E^{2} \sin ^{4} \frac{\theta}{2}}\left\{W_{2}\left(\nu, q^{2}\right) \cos ^{2} \frac{\theta}{2}+2 W_{1}\left(\nu, q^{2}\right) \sin ^{2} \frac{\theta}{2}\right\}
$$

Chai Santi
Chai Santi
Numerade Educator
09:26

Problem 13

The above results assume (lowest-order) single photon exchange is dominant. If two-photon exchange were significant, convince yourself that the $\mathrm{e}^{-} \mathrm{p}$ and $\mathrm{e}^{+} \mathrm{p}$ cross sections would not be equal.

Devi Dutta Biswajeet
Devi Dutta Biswajeet
Numerade Educator
18:03

Problem 14

Verify that $q \cdot \varepsilon=0$ for each $\lambda$, and show that, for a spacelike photon $\left(q^{2}<0\right)$,
$$
\sum(-1)^{\lambda+1} \varepsilon^{\mu^{*}} \varepsilon^{*}=-g^{\mu \nu}+\frac{q^{\mu} q^{v}}{q^{2}}
$$
where the sum runs over the three polarization states of (8.49) and (8.50). For $q^{2}>0$ the factor $(-1)^{\lambda+1}$ is omitted and the sum (8.51) with $q^{2}$ replaced by $M^{2}$ is identical to that over the spin states of a massive vector particle, see Section 6.12. see Section 6.12.

We can now evaluate the total cross sections for polarized photons (helicity $\lambda$ ) interacting with unpolarized protons:
$$
\sigma_{\lambda}^{\mathrm{tot}}=\frac{4 \pi^{2} \alpha}{K} \varepsilon_{\lambda}^{\mu *} \varepsilon_{\lambda}^{\nu} W_{\mu \nu}
$$
Using (8.24) for $W_{\mu \nu}$, together with the above polarization vectors, we find that the transverse and longitudinal cross sections are, respectively,

Christopher Provencher
Christopher Provencher
Numerade Educator
View

Problem 15

Verify eqs. (8.53) and (8.54). The calculation can be greatly simplified by writing the tensor decomposition for $W_{\mu \nu},(8.27)$, in the laboratory frame, where
$$
\begin{aligned}
&p=(M ; 0,0,0) \\
&q=\left(\nu ; 0,0, \sqrt{\nu^{2}-q^{2}}\right)
\end{aligned}
$$

Victor Salazar
Victor Salazar
Numerade Educator
01:02

Problem 16

Express the ep $\rightarrow$ eX differential cross section (8.34) in terms of $\sigma_{T, L} .$ That is, show that
$$
\left.\frac{d \sigma}{d E^{\prime} d \Omega}\right|_{\mathrm{lab}}=\Gamma\left(\sigma_{T}+\varepsilon \sigma_{L}\right)
$$
where
$$
\begin{aligned}
&\Gamma=\frac{\alpha K}{2 \pi^{2}\left|q^{2}\right|} \frac{E^{\prime}}{E} \frac{1}{1-\varepsilon} \\
&\varepsilon=\left(1-2 \frac{\nu^{2}-q^{2}}{q^{2}} \tan ^{2} \frac{\theta}{2}\right)^{-1}
\end{aligned}
$$

Raj Bala
Raj Bala
Numerade Educator
03:47

Problem 17

The formalism has been set up in such a way that, when $q^{2} \rightarrow 0$,
$$
\begin{aligned}
&\sigma_{T} \rightarrow \sigma^{\mathrm{tot}}(\gamma \mathrm{p}) \\
&\sigma_{L} \rightarrow 0
\end{aligned}
$$
where $\gamma$ is a real photon and $\sigma^{\text {tot }}(\gamma \mathrm{p})$ is given by (8.45). Despite its appearance, convince yourself that $W_{\mu \nu}$ must not be singular at $q^{2}=0 .$ Hence, show that
$$
W_{2} \rightarrow 0 \quad \text { and } \quad\left(W_{1}+\frac{\nu^{2}}{q^{2}} W_{2}\right) \rightarrow 0
$$
as $q^{2} \rightarrow 0$, and so establish that $\sigma_{L}$ vanishes.
Can we extract additional information about the structure of the proton from these complex events where the proton breaks up? Both the structure of the events and their phenomenological interpretation look quite forbidding. The answer to this question is of great importance and is the subject of the next two chapters.

Chai Santi
Chai Santi
Numerade Educator